10 KiB
Implementation Plan: Multi-Tenant SaaS Platform for Malaysian SMEs
Branch: 001-1-target-sectors | Date: 2025-10-04 | Spec: /specs/001-1-target-sectors/spec.md
Input: Feature specification from /specs/001-1-target-sectors/spec.md
Execution Flow (/plan command scope)
1. Load feature spec from Input path
→ If not found: ERROR "No feature spec at {path}"
2. Fill Technical Context (scan for NEEDS CLARIFICATION)
→ Detect Project Type from file system structure or context (web=frontend+backend, mobile=app+api)
→ Set Structure Decision based on project type
3. Fill the Constitution Check section based on the content of the constitution document.
4. Evaluate Constitution Check section below
→ If violations exist: Document in Complexity Tracking
→ If no justification possible: ERROR "Simplify approach first"
→ Update Progress Tracking: Initial Constitution Check
5. Execute Phase 0 → research.md
→ If NEEDS CLARIFICATION remain: ERROR "Resolve unknowns"
6. Execute Phase 1 → contracts, data-model.md, quickstart.md, agent-specific template file (e.g., `CLAUDE.md` for Claude Code, `.github/copilot-instructions.md` for GitHub Copilot, `GEMINI.md` for Gemini CLI, `QWEN.md` for Qwen Code, or `AGENTS.md` for all other agents).
7. Re-evaluate Constitution Check section
→ If new violations: Refactor design, return to Phase 1
→ Update Progress Tracking: Post-Design Constitution Check
8. Plan Phase 2 → Describe task generation approach (DO NOT create tasks.md)
9. STOP - Ready for /tasks command
IMPORTANT: The /plan command STOPS at step 7. Phases 2-4 are executed by other commands:
- Phase 2: /tasks command creates tasks.md
- Phase 3-4: Implementation execution (manual or via tools)
Summary
Multi-tenant SaaS platform targeting Malaysian SMEs with industry-specific modules (Retail, Healthcare, Education, Logistics, Beauty). Features include modular architecture, dual pricing models (subscription and perpetual license), multi-tenant data isolation, and comprehensive business management tools for each sector.
Technical Context
Language/Version: Python 3.11+ with Django/FastAPI for backend, React/Next.js for frontend Primary Dependencies: Django/FastAPI, PostgreSQL, React/Next.js, Stripe API, Redis, Docker Storage: PostgreSQL with row-level security for multi-tenant isolation Testing: pytest for backend, Jest for frontend, integration tests for APIs Target Platform: Web-based SaaS platform (Linux servers) Project Type: Web application (backend + frontend) Performance Goals: 1000 concurrent users, <200ms response time for 95% of requests Constraints: Multi-tenant data isolation, Malaysian payment method integration, healthcare compliance standards Scale/Scope: 100 tenants with 10 users each (expandable), 5 industry modules
Constitution Check
GATE: Must pass before Phase 0 research. Re-check after Phase 1 design.
Constitution Status: Template placeholders detected - actual constitution needs to be defined
- Core principles not yet defined
- Testing approach needs constitutional alignment
- Governance structure requires specification
Recommendation: Define constitution before proceeding with implementation to ensure alignment with project values and standards.
Project Structure
Documentation (this feature)
specs/001-1-target-sectors/
├── plan.md # This file (/plan command output)
├── research.md # Phase 0 output (/plan command)
├── data-model.md # Phase 1 output (/plan command)
├── quickstart.md # Phase 1 output (/plan command)
├── contracts/ # Phase 1 output (/plan command)
└── tasks.md # Phase 2 output (/tasks command - NOT created by /plan)
Source Code (repository root)
backend/
├── src/
│ ├── core/ # Core multi-tenant infrastructure
│ │ ├── models/ # Base tenant, user, subscription models
│ │ ├── auth/ # Authentication and authorization
│ │ ├── billing/ # Subscription and payment handling
│ │ └── admin/ # Back office administration
│ ├── modules/ # Industry-specific modules
│ │ ├── retail/ # Retail & Food Stalls module
│ │ ├── healthcare/ # Healthcare module
│ │ ├── education/ # Education module
│ │ ├── logistics/ # Logistics module
│ │ └── beauty/ # Beauty & Personal Care module
│ └── api/ # REST API endpoints
├── tests/
│ ├── contract/ # API contract tests
│ ├── integration/ # Module integration tests
│ └── unit/ # Unit tests
└── migrations/ # Database migrations
frontend/
├── src/
│ ├── components/ # Reusable UI components
│ ├── pages/ # Application pages
│ ├── modules/ # Module-specific components
│ ├── hooks/ # Custom React hooks
│ ├── services/ # API service layer
│ └── utils/ # Utility functions
├── tests/ # Frontend tests
└── public/ # Static assets
shared/
├── types/ # TypeScript type definitions
└── contracts/ # Shared API contracts
docker/ # Docker configuration
├── backend/
├── frontend/
└── postgres/
docs/ # Project documentation
└── api/ # API documentation
Structure Decision: Web application with separate backend/frontend for scalability and independent deployment. Modular backend structure allows for plug-and-play industry modules. Shared types ensure API consistency.
Progress Tracking
- Phase 0: Research completed (research.md generated)
- Phase 1: Design completed (data-model.md, contracts/, quickstart.md generated)
- Phase 2: Task planning (122 tasks created in tasks.md)
- Phase 3: Task execution (ready to begin)
- Phase 4: Implementation (pending)
- Phase 5: Validation (pending)
Phase 0: Outline & Research
-
Extract unknowns from Technical Context above:
- For each NEEDS CLARIFICATION → research task
- For each dependency → best practices task
- For each integration → patterns task
-
Generate and dispatch research agents:
For each unknown in Technical Context: Task: "Research {unknown} for {feature context}" For each technology choice: Task: "Find best practices for {tech} in {domain}" -
Consolidate findings in
research.mdusing format:- Decision: [what was chosen]
- Rationale: [why chosen]
- Alternatives considered: [what else evaluated]
Output: research.md with all NEEDS CLARIFICATION resolved
Phase 1: Design & Contracts
Prerequisites: research.md complete
-
Extract entities from feature spec →
data-model.md:- Entity name, fields, relationships
- Validation rules from requirements
- State transitions if applicable
-
Generate API contracts from functional requirements:
- For each user action → endpoint
- Use standard REST/GraphQL patterns
- Output OpenAPI/GraphQL schema to
/contracts/
-
Generate contract tests from contracts:
- One test file per endpoint
- Assert request/response schemas
- Tests must fail (no implementation yet)
-
Extract test scenarios from user stories:
- Each story → integration test scenario
- Quickstart test = story validation steps
-
Update agent file incrementally (O(1) operation):
- Run
.specify/scripts/bash/update-agent-context.sh claudeIMPORTANT: Execute it exactly as specified above. Do not add or remove any arguments. - If exists: Add only NEW tech from current plan
- Preserve manual additions between markers
- Update recent changes (keep last 3)
- Keep under 150 lines for token efficiency
- Output to repository root
- Run
Output: data-model.md, /contracts/*, failing tests, quickstart.md, agent-specific file
Phase 2: Task Planning Approach
This section describes what the /tasks command will do - DO NOT execute during /plan
Task Generation Strategy:
- Load
.specify/templates/tasks-template.mdas base - Generate tasks from Phase 1 design docs (contracts, data model, quickstart)
- Each contract → contract test task [P]
- Each entity → model creation task [P]
- Each user story → integration test task
- Implementation tasks to make tests pass
Ordering Strategy:
- TDD order: Tests before implementation
- Dependency order: Models before services before UI
- Mark [P] for parallel execution (independent files)
Estimated Output: 25-30 numbered, ordered tasks in tasks.md
IMPORTANT: This phase is executed by the /tasks command, NOT by /plan
Phase 3+: Future Implementation
These phases are beyond the scope of the /plan command
Phase 3: Task execution (/tasks command creates tasks.md)
Phase 4: Implementation (execute tasks.md following constitutional principles)
Phase 5: Validation (run tests, execute quickstart.md, performance validation)
Complexity Tracking
Fill ONLY if Constitution Check has violations that must be justified
| Violation | Why Needed | Simpler Alternative Rejected Because |
|---|---|---|
| [e.g., 4th project] | [current need] | [why 3 projects insufficient] |
| [e.g., Repository pattern] | [specific problem] | [why direct DB access insufficient] |
Progress Tracking
This checklist is updated during execution flow
Phase Status:
- Phase 0: Research complete (/plan command)
- Phase 1: Design complete (/plan command)
- Phase 2: Task planning complete (/plan command - describe approach only)
- Phase 3: Tasks generated (/tasks command)
- Phase 4: Implementation complete
- Phase 5: Validation passed
Gate Status:
- Initial Constitution Check: PASS
- Post-Design Constitution Check: PASS
- All NEEDS CLARIFICATION resolved
- Complexity deviations documented
Based on Constitution v2.1.1 - See /memory/constitution.md