Some checks failed
System Monitoring / Health Checks (push) Has been cancelled
System Monitoring / Performance Monitoring (push) Has been cancelled
System Monitoring / Database Monitoring (push) Has been cancelled
System Monitoring / Cache Monitoring (push) Has been cancelled
System Monitoring / Log Monitoring (push) Has been cancelled
System Monitoring / Resource Monitoring (push) Has been cancelled
System Monitoring / Uptime Monitoring (push) Has been cancelled
System Monitoring / Backup Monitoring (push) Has been cancelled
System Monitoring / Security Monitoring (push) Has been cancelled
System Monitoring / Monitoring Dashboard (push) Has been cancelled
System Monitoring / Alerting (push) Has been cancelled
Security Scanning / Dependency Scanning (push) Has been cancelled
Security Scanning / Code Security Scanning (push) Has been cancelled
Security Scanning / Secrets Scanning (push) Has been cancelled
Security Scanning / Container Security Scanning (push) Has been cancelled
Security Scanning / Compliance Checking (push) Has been cancelled
Security Scanning / Security Dashboard (push) Has been cancelled
Security Scanning / Security Remediation (push) Has been cancelled
150 lines
8.4 KiB
Markdown
150 lines
8.4 KiB
Markdown
# Feature Specification: Multi-Tenant SaaS Platform for Malaysian SMEs
|
|
|
|
**Feature Branch**: `001-1-target-sectors`
|
|
**Created**: 2025-10-04
|
|
**Status**: Draft
|
|
**Input**: User description: "Multi-tenant SaaS platform targeting Malaysian SMEs with industry-specific modules"
|
|
|
|
## Execution Flow (main)
|
|
```
|
|
1. Parse user description from Input
|
|
→ If empty: ERROR "No feature description provided"
|
|
2. Extract key concepts from description
|
|
→ Identify: actors, actions, data, constraints
|
|
3. For each unclear aspect:
|
|
→ Mark with [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: specific question]
|
|
4. Fill User Scenarios & Testing section
|
|
→ If no clear user flow: ERROR "Cannot determine user scenarios"
|
|
5. Generate Functional Requirements
|
|
→ Each requirement must be testable
|
|
→ Mark ambiguous requirements
|
|
6. Identify Key Entities (if data involved)
|
|
7. Run Review Checklist
|
|
→ If any [NEEDS CLARIFICATION]: WARN "Spec has uncertainties"
|
|
→ If implementation details found: ERROR "Remove tech details"
|
|
8. Return: SUCCESS (spec ready for planning)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## ⚡ Quick Guidelines
|
|
- ✅ Focus on WHAT users need and WHY
|
|
- ❌ Avoid HOW to implement (no tech stack, APIs, code structure)
|
|
- 👥 Written for business stakeholders, not developers
|
|
|
|
### Section Requirements
|
|
- **Mandatory sections**: Must be completed for every feature
|
|
- **Optional sections**: Include only when relevant to the feature
|
|
- When a section doesn't apply, remove it entirely (don't leave as "N/A")
|
|
|
|
### For AI Generation
|
|
When creating this spec from a user prompt:
|
|
1. **Mark all ambiguities**: Use [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: specific question] for any assumption you'd need to make
|
|
2. **Don't guess**: If the prompt doesn't specify something (e.g., "login system" without auth method), mark it
|
|
3. **Think like a tester**: Every vague requirement should fail the "testable and unambiguous" checklist item
|
|
4. **Common underspecified areas**:
|
|
- User types and permissions
|
|
- Data retention/deletion policies
|
|
- Performance targets and scale
|
|
- Error handling behaviors
|
|
- Integration requirements
|
|
- Security/compliance needs
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Clarifications
|
|
|
|
### Session 2025-10-04
|
|
- Q: What authentication method should the platform use for user access? → A: All methods support
|
|
- Q: How long should tenant data be retained after subscription ends or account deletion? → A: 90 days after subscription ends
|
|
- Q: What healthcare data compliance standards must the platform meet for Malaysian healthcare providers? → A: Support all
|
|
- Q: What is the expected scale for concurrent tenants and users per tenant? → A: Small: 100 tenants, 10 users per tenant with option to expand in future
|
|
- Q: When switching from subscription to perpetual license, what happens to data access during the transition period? → A: Admin-controlled access during transition
|
|
|
|
## User Scenarios & Testing *(mandatory)*
|
|
|
|
### Primary User Story
|
|
As a Malaysian SME business owner, I want to access industry-specific business management modules through a subscription-based SaaS platform so that I can streamline my operations without investing in expensive custom software or IT infrastructure.
|
|
|
|
### Acceptance Scenarios
|
|
1. **Given** a new business owner wants to register, **When** they receive an admin registration link and complete business details, **Then** the system creates an isolated tenant space pending approval
|
|
2. **Given** an admin approves a tenant registration, **When** approval is processed, **Then** the tenant receives credentials and can access subscribed modules
|
|
3. **Given** a retail business user has subscribed, **When** they access their tenant dashboard, **Then** they can only use Retail & Food Stall modules based on their subscription plan
|
|
4. **Given** a healthcare clinic has subscribed, **When** they access the system, **Then** they can manage patient records, appointments, and billing through their dedicated module
|
|
5. **Given** a business wants to change pricing models, **When** they request to switch from subscription to perpetual license, **Then** the system calculates the buyout price based on subscription payments made
|
|
|
|
### Edge Cases
|
|
- What happens when a tenant exceeds their subscription module limits?
|
|
- How does system handle concurrent access within the same tenant organization?
|
|
- What happens if a tenant's subscription payment fails?
|
|
- How does system ensure data isolation between tenants during peak usage?
|
|
|
|
## Requirements *(mandatory)*
|
|
|
|
### Functional Requirements
|
|
- **FR-001**: System MUST support multi-tenant architecture where each business has isolated data and workspace
|
|
- **FR-002**: System MUST provide industry-specific modules for Retail, Healthcare, Education, Logistics, and Beauty sectors
|
|
- **FR-003**: System MUST support two pricing models: one-time perpetual license and recurring subscription
|
|
- **FR-004**: System MUST provide a back office for administrators to manage tenant registrations, subscriptions, and module access
|
|
- **FR-005**: System MUST allow tenants to customize their workspace with branding (logos and settings)
|
|
- **FR-006**: Retail module MUST include POS system supporting sales, receipts, and Malaysian payment methods (e-wallets, FPX)
|
|
- **FR-007**: Retail module MUST include inventory management with automated alerts
|
|
- **FR-008**: Healthcare module MUST include patient registration, records management, and appointment booking with reminders
|
|
- **FR-009**: Healthcare module MUST include medicine stock management
|
|
- **FR-010**: Education module MUST include student management, class scheduling, and fee tracking
|
|
- **FR-011**: Education module MUST provide parent communication portal
|
|
- **FR-012**: Logistics module MUST support shipment creation, tracking (QR/ID), and digital proof of delivery
|
|
- **FR-013**: Logistics module MUST include vehicle/fleet management with basic route optimization
|
|
- **FR-014**: Beauty module MUST provide appointment booking with calendar view and automated reminders
|
|
- **FR-015**: Beauty module MUST include client profiles and service history management
|
|
- **FR-016**: System MUST integrate with payment processors for recurring billing and one-time payments
|
|
- **FR-017**: System MUST support tenant switching between pricing models with appropriate financial calculations
|
|
- **FR-018**: System MUST provide usage monitoring dashboards for administrators
|
|
- **FR-019**: System MUST enforce modular architecture allowing plug-and-play functionality
|
|
- **FR-020**: System MUST support future mobile app integration through APIs
|
|
|
|
- **FR-021**: System MUST support multiple authentication methods including email/password, SSO, OAuth, Malaysian National ID, and multi-factor authentication
|
|
- **FR-022**: System MUST retain tenant data for 90 days after subscription ends before permanent deletion
|
|
- **FR-023**: System MUST support all healthcare compliance standards including PDPA 2010, Malaysian Ministry of Health guidelines, and international healthcare standards
|
|
|
|
### Key Entities *(include if feature involves data)*
|
|
- **Tenant**: Represents a business organization with isolated data, subscription status, and module access (supports up to 100 tenants with 10 users each, expandable)
|
|
- **User**: Individuals within tenant organizations with roles and permissions, authenticated via multiple methods
|
|
- **Module**: Industry-specific business functionality packages that can be subscribed to individually
|
|
- **Subscription**: Defines pricing plan, billing cycle, and module access for tenants, with admin-controlled access during pricing model transitions
|
|
- **Business Data**: Tenant-specific information managed within each module (products, patients, students, shipments, etc.), retained for 90 days after subscription
|
|
- **Payment Transaction**: Records of billing and payments for subscriptions and one-time licenses
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Review & Acceptance Checklist
|
|
*GATE: Automated checks run during main() execution*
|
|
|
|
### Content Quality
|
|
- [ ] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
|
|
- [ ] Focused on user value and business needs
|
|
- [ ] Written for non-technical stakeholders
|
|
- [ ] All mandatory sections completed
|
|
|
|
### Requirement Completeness
|
|
- [ ] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
|
|
- [ ] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
|
|
- [ ] Success criteria are measurable
|
|
- [ ] Scope is clearly bounded
|
|
- [ ] Dependencies and assumptions identified
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Execution Status
|
|
*Updated by main() during processing*
|
|
|
|
- [ ] User description parsed
|
|
- [ ] Key concepts extracted
|
|
- [ ] Ambiguities marked
|
|
- [ ] User scenarios defined
|
|
- [ ] Requirements generated
|
|
- [ ] Entities identified
|
|
- [ ] Review checklist passed
|
|
|
|
---
|